Showing posts with label Robotics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robotics. Show all posts

Sunday, January 06, 2008

WowWee's New Robots

From in-home surveillance robots to flying battle bots, WowWee is showing more than 20 new robots at the Consumer Electronics Show this week in Las Vegas. Here's a sneak peek at the company's 2008 robot lineup.




Rovio, the Home Survellance Robot

The $300 Rovio has a video camera, microphone, and Wi-Fi capabilities on board. The three-wheeled omnidirectional robot can stream video from its camera to remote locations with a broadband-connected Windows PC or smartphone. The robot is WowWee's first foray into remote home surveillance and "telepresence."



Rovio Recharging

Rovio can maneuver on its own; it doesn't have to be supervised continuously by remote control. The robot stores information about the location of furniture and various objects in the home to avoid collisions, and can cruise around on its own when prompted. It will even retreat to its docking station (pictured here) when it needs to recharge its battery. Rovio is slated to hit stores this fall.




FemiSapien: The Female of the Species

WowWee is also targeting some new robots at women and girls. FemiSapien is a female humanoid robot that dances to music it "hears" via its onboard microphone, and can control other robots in WowWee's lineup. The $100 robot reacts to voice commands and even human touch. It is scheduled for release in late summer.



Tri-Bot Tells Jokes

WowWee's popular Robosapien line moves to the next generation with Tri-Bot, a three-wheeled omnidirectional robot, also scheduled for release in the summer. Tri-Bot boasts animated eyebrows to go along with its joke-telling skills. The $100 robot also has a motion-sensitive remote control that allows the user to steer it simply by tilting the remote.




FlyTech BladeStar Soars (Indoors)

The FlyTech BladeStar is a helicopter-like flying robot that can either be controlled via remote or set to autopilot. Its onboard sensors prevent it from colliding with other objects. Its "Dogfight" accessory allows two BladeStar owners to engage in aerial combat. BladeStar, priced at $50, will be available exclusively at Target starting in February.




Mr. Personality -- Your Robotic Buddy

Boasting a color LCD screen for a face, WowWee's Mr. Personality robot is designed for laughs. It tells jokes, plays games, and you can even update or revamp its personality traits by downloading your selection and loading the changes into Mr. Personality with a USB connection. Priced at $250, Mr. Personality is scheduled to be available this summer.


Sunday, November 04, 2007

Renegade Gaming Chair


The Renegade Gaming Chair is not just a gaming chair for the kids, but it comes with lots of other features which makes this model available to people of all age groups. Here are some of the features of the Renegade Gaming Chair:

  • Game synced with vibration motors
  • 3D speakers on the headrest
  • Lighting effects
  • Massaging chair
The chair is USB compatible with Xbox 360, PS3, Wii, PS2, PC and iPod.

Saturday, May 19, 2007

Tamanoi Vinegar Robot

Robot to promote vinegar -- On May 18, buildup Co., Ltd. unveiled the Tamanoi Vinegar Robot, the world’s first robot designed to make presentations about vinegar. The robot is scheduled to go to work at the Tamanoi Vinegar Corporation’s Osaka office in July.

Relying on pre-programmed speech and gestures to communicate its knowledge of vinegar, the robot features a system of pneumatic servos that control 24 points of articulation in the upper half of its body. The 180 cm (nearly 6 ft), 100 kg (220 lb) machine has a mouth that moves in sync with its voice, as well as a fiber-reinforced plastic outer shell that is colored black — like Tamanoi’s black vinegar — with an iridescent coating that changes hue according to the viewing angle.

The robot’s first duties will be to entertain guests at Tamanoi’s “Cyber Trip” amusement theater located in the company’s new head office in Osaka. In addition to the robot, the theater will feature a 12-minute high-definition video on vinegar, also produced by buildup.

Watch video of the robot HERE.

Monday, April 02, 2007

5 Cool underwater robots


Robot lovers in Tokyo were in for a treat as the 2007 Underwater robot convention took off at the Tatsumi International an Olympic sized swimming pool. Around 80 robots were showcased, below is a list of the 5 coolest robots.
No 5 - Robotic Submarine
Modelled to the last detail this little baby has everything except torpedoes. From the remote control you can fill / empty the ballast tanks to make the sub dive or surface, control the speed and directions, and boy does it go fast.

No 4 - Q Diver
It is robots like the Q Diver which unfold the mysteries if the deep sea in the future. This remote controlled device is powered by a battery and has miniature fins which guide the Q to the desired location. In the future we can see similar devices fitted with cameras and robotic arms exploring the depths.

No 3 - Robotic Snake
Developed by the University of Tokyo this 86 cms long robotic snake is completely water proof. It has a built in micro processor for controlling the movement, an altitude sensor and a regulator. It is designed to examine places which are too narrow and dangerous for divers.

No 2 - Robotic Flipper
Here is something unique from the Tokyo Institute of Technology, a robotic flipper with hands which cuts through the water doing the popular butterfly style. It can also dive underwater.

No 1 - Robotic Snake - II
This is the same Robotic Snake developed by University of Tokyo but with rubber casing which gives it more speed allowing it to move at an astounding speed of 46cms per second on water which might even put the real snake to shame.

aqua_ph_27.jpg
Honorable Mention - USS Enterprise
Darn, not much info on the underwater USS Enterprise, except for this picture for Star Trek fans to gaze at.

Robot Rescues Fugitive from Seoul Sewer

In more robot news from Asia, here's an interesting story about a sewer inspection robot that was used to locate a fugitive who'd hidden in the city sewer. The man, who'd stolen a woman's purse, escaped into a sewer pipe. Unfortunately, he'd been stripped of his clothes while fleeing, and he chose an exceptionally cold time to do so - the temperature was 34 degrees F.

The robot located the man, who'd apparently gotten lost in the pipes. The robot, a sewage pipe inspection robot, has six wheels and comes equipped with a camera.

Here's a video of a Korean Japanese news report on the event:

Readying Robots For War

The $45,000 "PackBots" robot (AP/Pentagon)

Quote

"The best I can say at this point is the Army in general is aggressively looking at applying robots in all future operations."
Col. Bruce Jette


(AP) In future wars, robots may drop from the sky by the hundreds from unmanned aircraft, swarming like giant insects over battlefields in coordinated, terrifying assaults.

But that is a decades-away scenario.

For now, military planners and robot designers are simply trying to improve devices - some of which could see action soon in Iraq - by incorporating lessons from Afghanistan, where robots saw their first significant military action.

You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the military who says robots will one day replace soldiers.

Yet the newest robots being developed by companies including iRobot range farther from their "masters" than did their forebears in Afghanistan. They can navigate terrain and obstacles more deftly, lay down a cover of smoke, test for chemical weapons and extend a "neck" that can peer around corners.

The machines are also learning how to right themselves if they flip over as well as how to follow their tracks back home if they lose contact with their base.

The Pentagon has no doubts robots can save lives.

"I don't have any problem writing to iRobot, saying 'I'm sorry your robot died, can we get another?"' said Col. Bruce Jette, the Army's point man on robot deployment, who accompanied the first, $45,000 iRobot "PackBots" into the field in Afghanistan. "That's a lot easier letter to write than to a father or mother."

Prior to Afghanistan, the military was using robots for search-and-rescue and ordnance disposal, but mostly viewed them as long-term research. Airborne drones had proved easier to build than effective land robots.

But the new conflict persuaded the military to move faster. At the time, the state-of-the-art means for clearing a cave was to tie a rope around the waist of an infantryman, who would crawl in and toss ahead a grappling hook to probe for mines or booby traps.

The Pentagon asked iRobot, a startup that emerged out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's artificial intelligence program, to rig up its latest prototypes of the 42-pound, remote-controlled PackBot.

Able to ride on tracks like a small tank, climb stairs and work under 3 meters of water or force of up to 400 times gravity, Packbots made their debut just six weeks later at a cave complex outside the village of Nazaraht, near the Pakistani border.

The robots sent video back to the troops, sparing them the risk of being dispatched by booby trap or enemy combatant.
"
Their first reaction was, 'Where have you been?"' Jette said.

Later, they offered advice, complaining that the signal wasn't penetrating the walls of deep caves. So Tom Frost, an iRobot engineer at the scene, built a makeshift network of radio repeaters by scavenging old Soviet trucks that littered Bagram Air Base.

And when soldiers asked Frost if PackBot could work with the computers integrated into their clothing, he downloaded the necessary code over a satellite.

The soldiers also scribbled a drawing of their idea for an extendable neck. The company was already working on that, but made it a top priority.

Now, in the comparative comfort of its lab back home, iRobot is fine-tuning all those adjustments.

Another lesson from Afghanistan: One size does not fit all.

Sometimes, Jette said, soldiers wanted an 80-pound workhorse like a model built by Foster-Miller of Waltham, which was also tested in Afghanistan. Sometimes, the PackBot was just the right size.

And sometimes, especially in towns, what the soldiers really wanted was a "throw bot" they could toss over a wall or through a window.

"The question is, can you get three-quarters of the capability of those robots at one-tenth the weight," said Robert Larsen, a program manager at Draper Labs, an MIT spin-off that is developing a military robot that resembles the PackBot but weighs less than 5 pounds.

Draper's device, though unlikely to be ready in time for Iraq, is cheap, too. Because it's controlled by an off-the-shelf PDA device, Larsen said, it could cost as little as a few hundred dollars.

The small size has its disadvantages, however.

"When you get small, everything becomes an obstacle," Larsen said, struggling to drive the device over a reporter's crumpled coat at a recent trade show.

The Afghan experience doesn't necessarily mean robots will see widespread action in Iraq.

There are only a handful to go around, and so far U.S. soldiers gathering in Kuwait are not training with them, said John Spiller, a civilian who works with Jette.

"The best I can say at this point is the Army in general is aggressively looking at applying robots in all future operations," said Jette. "I think it would be useful in an open battle."

Planners continue to put a number of robots through their paces at the Army's Military Operations in Urban Terrain center at Fort Benning, Ga., where soldiers train to fight in a mock city.

And the kind of urban warfare - peering around corners, clearing buildings - that would likely happen in Iraq is precisely what robots have been designed for.

Robots will someday master many of the complex, individual tasks required in combat, experts insist. Then, something even more powerful will follow: robots that work together.

It's a prospective weapon whose effectiveness would derive at least partly from the sheer terror it could impose on an enemy.

"When you see one robot coming down, it's interesting and even if it has a weapon on it, maybe it's a little scary and you give it a little respect," said Arniss Mangolds, vice president of Foster-Miller's robot division. "But if you're standing somewhere and see 10 robots coming at you, it's scary."

Jette says robots will never fully replace soldiers.

"None of them," he says, "are as powerful as the 2.5-pound gray blob inside your head."

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Robots.Video: Dynamic Dextor

The Swirling Brain sent us a link to a really cool video of Anybot's dynamically balancing walking robot, named Dextor. The robot actually balances much like a human, instead of using the more common Zero Moment Point (ZMP) algorithm used by robots like ASIMO. Paul Graham wrote a detailed blog post about about Dextor's first first successful walk. Dextor is a biped robot about 5'10", weighing in at 135lbs. The robot uses air cylinders which provide a spring-like quality similar to human muscles, allowing the robot to achieve more life-like movement.




Tea Serving Robots

From the swirling web browser of The Swirling Brain comes a link to a CNN article about Japanese tea serving robots. Japanese robotics researcher, still intent on producing robots that can care for the elderly, are exploring how well they can make robots perform common tasks such as serving tea and washing dishes. In this experiment, a Kawanda Industries biped humanoid robot poured the tea, which was then delivered to humans in another room by a second, wheeled robot. This work is being done by Tomomasa Sato of the Intelligent Cooperative Systems Lab at the University of Tokyo.

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Artificial Idiots

If you’ve heard of Isaac Asimov, the Positronic Brain and the Three Laws of Robotics, you’re probably as disappointed as we are with the current state of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Sure, computers have evolved from machines the size of buildings to chips the size of your thumb! We’re not saying that computers haven’t become smarter; we’re just asking, by how much?

An AI pioneer called Herbert Simon said in 1965 that machines would, by 1985, be capable of doing any work a man can do. It’s 2006 now, and far from “doing any work a man can do,” machines can’t even use a broom to sweep a room! OK, there are robotic vacuum cleaners, but those just avoid collisions and go around the room—can you even imagine a robot asking you, in English, “Should I sweep out that corner as well?” (Because it can see that the corner isn’t all that dirty, and that more energy might unnecessarily be expended doing it—since it knows from experience that you don’t demand that every nook and cranny be perfectly clean, because you’d rather get the job done quicker?)

We want to see AI put to practical use. Unfortunately, there’s hardly any of that happening in the fields we’d like to see it happen in. Sure, there are “expert systems” in the field of medicine and others, and robots that use AI to navigate, but we want to see it in our everyday lives!

But Everyone Claims To Have A Solution and that’s one of the problems plaguing AI. There are so many brilliant minds involved in so much varied research, and noone seems to be able to arrive at a consensus about what’s needed. A robot here is coded to navigate a maze, a chat-bot there is coded to behave like a doctor!

They’re all specialised! What we need—or rather, what we want—is a generalised artificial intelligence, something that behaves the way we do: employing common sense, realizing when something is repeating, and so on. In fact, common sense and pattern matching—two of the biggest AI problems—just haven’t been solved in all these decades! And no, hard-coding common sense by using world knowledge just doesn’t cut it.

Imitating human intelligence is another issue: brain modeling apart, there’s too much of that going on—when will researchers get to developing an entirely new kind of intelligence? Why does intelligence have to be human?

Thinking Machines

We’ve seen supercomputers beat grandmasters in chess games, but even those instances were riddled with controversy—with the humans claiming that the computer was specifically programmed to beat him! We still haven’t seen a computer win a chess tournament, beating many different grandmasters.

But that’s just chess! After all, it is a game of logic and mathematics, which come naturally to computers. What we really want to see is a computer that can answer such questions as “Three of us need to enter a room; how many doors are needed?” If a computer or robot can answer these questions using common sense—without specifically being coded to do so—then we will have achieved true artificial intelligence, the I, Robot type.

The Current Scene

As of now, there’s really nothing new that one would want to write home about. Like we said at the outset, computers and software have become more knowledgeable, but not more intelligent.

We need more AI programs to understand better. More and more people are looking to adaptive software and natural language understanding, with logical decisionmaking in their AI software. This is good, but we’re still far from any breakthroughs, and Asimov’s Positronic Brain, alas, is just fiction as yet.

A lot of areas of research are proclaiming and promising results soon. However, soon is widely believed to be over a decade or two, and the broken promises of the past cause us to take AI timelines with a rather large pinch of salt. Ai Research (www.a-i.com), for instance, is working on starting off

a software as a child, and gradually teaching it and making it smarter.

In their words:

“Founded to create true artificial intelligence—making it possible for humans and computers to speak to each other in everyday language—Ai is an international project with a research center near Tel Aviv, Israel.

“The Ai team consists of scientists, researchers, engineers, and language specialists. All work together to nurture Ai’s child machine, and to ensure that it will successfully pass the Turing Test within the next 10 years.”

(“Turing Test” refers to the idea that if a man and a machine can be confused for each other, the machine has passed the Turing Test.)

Artificial Idiots

If we’re only talking about the Turing Test, there might be a few projects that will come close in the next decade. However, making machines as smart as a teenager, even, might take a lot, lot longer.

Right now, we’re stuck playing games against moronic AI that is stuck debugging a simple program where you’ve put an OR instead of an AND! You’re also going to be irritated by the same software bugs, again and again, until human research brings about true artificially sentient software, which learns, adapts, and can hold its own against human brains! For now, AI is a huge disappointment, and has been relegated to the stack of technologies that didn’t keep their promises.